JUNE
2006 |
||
| Agency Liaison Report Implementation of the Higher Education Reconciliation Act of 2005 has the attention of state agencies and guarantors. The Academic Competitiveness Grant program requires student recipients to have completed a rigorous secondary school program. While there are four paths to having a secondary school program deemed rigorous, the U.S. Secretary of Education has recognized programs in four SASFAA states – Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky and Virginia – as meeting the required standard. States had until June 1 to submit programs for recognition. Guarantors have been making decisions on payment of the Federal default fee. For loans guaranteed on or after July 1, 2006 guarantors are required to pay a 1% Federal default fee into the agency’s Federal Reserve Fund. The law authorizes guarantors to deduct this fee from the borrower’s Stafford loan proceeds or to pay it “from other non-Federal sources.” Some guarantors are paying the fee from their Operating Fund, and in some cases lenders are subsidizing the fee. Most guaranty agency reports that follow contain information describing how the designated guarantor for the state is handling this fee. Guarantors have been meeting since February to discuss implementation of the College Access Initiative, a new section added to the Higher Education Act by the HERA amendments. This new section requires guarantors to promote college access, a role all guarantors had been filling on a voluntary basis. Guarantors are coordinating these activities through the National Council of Higher Education Loan Programs (NCHELP), and will be working with Mapping Your Future to create state-specific college access web pages. Guarantors have decided to delay publication of the Common Manual from the traditional July date until September. This will allow the manual to contain new policies relating to the HERA amendments. Development work is also underway on a Common Manual web site, and the launch date is targeted for September-October. The entire agency community is keeping an eye on possible reauthorization of the Higher Education Act. While the House has passed a reauthorization bill (HR 609), the Senate is not likely to address reauthorization until September at the earliest. It is likely Congress will have to pass at least one short-term extension of the HEA given the looming June 30 expiration date. National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs (NASSGAP) No report submitted. National Council of Higher Education Loan
Programs (NCHELP) A little more than 12 years have elapsed since President Clinton and the Congress, facing large budget deficits, took $4.8 billion from the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) and deeded the funds to the federal Treasury to reduce the federal deficit and attempt to restore confidence in the nation’s economy. Just a few months ago, President Bush and the Congress took almost $12 billion from the student loan programs, again dedicating the funds to reduction of the federal deficit. While Presidents and Congresses change, challenges to the FFELP seem to be a constant. There’s another similarity to the student loan world of the early 1990s: a general uneasiness among financial aid professionals who find themselves in the crossfire between institutional missions; an abundance of federal and state regulations; parents and students (who first besiege them with requests for aid decisions and then question those decisions); and external disruptions. As one long-time friend and colleague recently mumbled, “just give me a few days without marketing calls.” Yet, over the past 12 years, new student loan volume has increased
from $12.5 billion to more than $50 billion. Three widely accepted
reasons for this increase in loan volume are: the increasing demand
for postsecondary education and training; an increase in costs for
this education and training; and lagging federal and state grant and
scholarship support. Even with the dramatic growth of the past decade, the demand for student loans is sure to increase at an accelerated rate. Between 1996-97 and 2004-05, the number of students graduating each year from secondary school increased 14 percent from 2.6 million to more than three million students. The number of graduates is expected to increase an additional 10 percent over the next few years. As a result, postsecondary full-time enrollment is expected to increase by 16 percent over the next 10 years. Digging a bit deeper, these postsecondary students will be more ethnically diverse and economically disadvantaged than the graduates that preceded them. For example, it is expected that between 2005 and 2013, the number of Hispanics graduating from secondary schools will increase by 41 percent. These are staggering figures that -- when coupled with continued increases in educational costs, the expectation that grants and scholarships will be funded at insufficient levels, and other demands on families due to higher costs of living -- will result in an increased need for student loans. There is little doubt that the higher education loan community will be able to meet this future borrowing demand and continue to provide superb services to borrowers and schools. In fact, there will be startling improvements. There will be an accelerated commitment to offer college outreach and financial literacy services and debt management counseling. For schools, there will be an equally strong commitment to provide services that take advantage of emerging technology to process loans in a more efficient and highly secure manner. However, despite providing almost $1 billion in timely, virtually error-free loan funds each week, FFELP’s future seems never to be safe. The current political divisiveness in Washington unfortunately provides encouragement to those who would attempt to undermine the set of well coordinated federal student aid programs that benefit students and schools. I would like to make three observations on this topic. First, the similarities to the situation 12 years ago should give the FFELP community pause. Without question, the federal deficit and attempts to rein it in will be a unifying objective for both parties – the differences between the parties will be in the order of magnitude. The purpose of budget reconciliation is to “grab” cash, and at that point logical thinking leaves the building. Twelve years ago there was a Democratic-controlled Congress and White House and this past year Republicans controlled the legislative and executive branches. This points out that the FFEL Program is at risk regardless of which party is in control. One of FFELP's challenges is to overcome the current budget scoring methodology that unfairly favors Direct Lending. The higher education loan community continues to wage an extensive public information campaign about the factors that determine the costs of the FFEL and Direct Loan programs. Second, a growing number of financial aid professionals are openly concerned about aggressive marketing, whether directed at them, their students (or the parents of their students), or senior college officials such as their President or Vice President of Finance. The marketing of both FFELP and non-Title IV loans and attempts to “lock up” school volume for lenders and guarantors is resulting in some erosion of support for the entire FFEL program. Financial aid officials have always had strong views about entities that come between them and their students. The last of my observations is that FFELP is beginning to lose its common face. We’ve come a long way in making FFELP loans a seamless way to borrow for students and schools. However, as some loan marketing is being conducted outside of traditional channels, some of the benefits of commonality could be lost. As a result, some may view the FFELP as being more complicated then the Direct Loan Program. In conclusion, back to the positives. The higher education loan community provides a superior set of affordable loan services to meet what will be a growing demand. Yet, it will be tested. The higher education loan community met the challenges of the past 12 years through hard work and a commitment to the students and schools it serves. FFELP providers will need to reinforce that hard work and commitment as we continue to work in challenging times. Alabama Alabama Commission on Higher Education No report submitted. Kentucky Higher Education Assistance Authority,
designated guarantor for Alabama New Alabama College Loan Program Under an agreement with The Student Loan Peoplesm, which will administer the program for AHELC, students receiving Federal Stafford Loans through the Alabama College Loan Program will not pay an origination fee or a default fee. Parents and graduate students who receive Federal PLUS Loans through the program will not pay a default fee. The federal government requires lenders to charge the origination fee on PLUS Loans, but Alabama College Loan Program borrowers will receive an immediate 1 percent interest rate reduction. Borrowers of Stafford and PLUS Loans from the Alabama College Loan Program will receive a 5 percent reduction to the original loan principal after making the first 30 monthly, on-time payments. Borrowers will also qualify for a 0.25 percent interest rate reduction for automatic payments. Alabama Staff News Florida Florida Office of Student Financial Assistance,
State Scholarship and Grant Programs 2005-06 Academic Year 2006-07 Legislative and Budget Issues Several programs were enhanced to include additional benefits for students:
New programs include:
Web Applications at www.FloridaStudentFinancialAid.org Florida Office of Student Financial Assistance,
Federal Family Education Loan Programs OSFA Moves to TERP Web Enhancements
Default Prevention News
Federal Default Fee Georgia Georgia Student Finance Commission GSFC military awards The FY 2007 budget (HB 1027) for the Georgia Student Finance Commission dedicates agency funds to increase the Tuition Equalization Grant award amount for Georgia students enrolled in Georgia’s private colleges from $900 to $1,000 per student per year. The budget also appropriates funds for the HERO Scholarship, which awards $2,000 per academic year per student. In addition, the General Assembly committed $200,000 of the Commission’s agency funds toward service cancelable loans for students in nurse faculty programs. Federal default fee Tim Connell joins NCHELP Board Kentucky Kentucky Higher Education Assistance Authority Introducing Jane Roig and Jim Ackinson The Board Search Committee recently adopted a process to fill the Executive Director position and placed advertisements in national publications to solicit resumes. The Search Committee hopes to fill the position by July. The Board of Directors also selected Jim Ackinson as Financial Consultant.
He served 20 years as Chief Financial Officer of the Kentucky Housing
Corporation (KHC) until he retired earlier this year. His first day
in the office was March 20. Loan Operations USDE has designated The Student Loan Peoplesm as an Exceptional Performer for its compliance in servicing Federal Family Education Loans. To qualify for this distinction, USDE requires lenders and servicers to comply with servicing requirements set by USDE at a rate of 97 percent or higher. As an Exceptional Performer, The Student Loan People will have its student loans insured at the highest level by USDE beginning June 1, resulting in savings that can be used to provide additional services to help students and families plan and pay for higher education. For many years, The Student Loan People has converted student loan revenues into state student financial aid awards, free college planning and financial aid publications, and innovative borrower benefit programs. KHEAA began making Zip Access Loan Processing services available to groups of schools on May 8. Zip Access Loan Processing will help schools manage the loan process with:
KHEAA and KHESLC chose Priority Technologies, Inc., (PTI), a leader in student loan technology solutions, to develop the customized, comprehensive software product which will provide schools with the ability to manage all portions of the student loan process. PTI’s products are in use by over 500 schools nationwide and are widely praised by those schools. Borrower Benefits For new PLUS Loans disbursed after June 30, 2006, The Student Loan PeopleSM will:
The maximum principal cancellation benefit in all Student Loan Peoplesm specialty programs (Best in Class, Best in Care, and Best in Law) will be limited to $10,000 annually. Student Aid A Circuit Court judge made a ruling in the Kentucky’s Affordable Prepaid Tuition (KAPT) lawsuit on April 14. The ruling stated (1) the transfer of $13.7 million from the KAPT Program Fund to the Kentucky’s General Fund required by the 2005 state budget bill was unconstitutional and (2) the repeal of KRS 393.015, which provided the backing of the Unclaimed Property Fund for KAPT tuition contract obligations, could not apply to current KAPT contract holders, and the Commonwealth must fulfill the tuition payment obligation of all current KAPT contract holders. The Kentucky Education Savings Plan Trust (KESPT) launched the KESPT Futuretrust® cash rebate program on April 17. KESPT account owners may now:
When rebates total $25, the money will be automatically swept into an investment in the KESPT account. Electronic Award Notice and Payment Planner GoHigherKY The Kentucky Department of Education (KDE) has issued a contract and work has begun on the Individual Learning Plan (ILP) component of GoHigherKY.org (GHK). KDE anticipates an August 2006 go-live date. All students in Kentucky will be required to set up a GHK account in middle school beginning next year. Xap Corporation, which designed and operates GHK, is working with a third party to set up the electronic transcript process with school districts and STI, a company that manages Kentucky’s K-12 school data software, to develop a process to load and transmit data to colleges. Staff hopes to have some pilot schools using the process by this fall. Mississippi USA Funds, designated guarantor for Mississippi Report explores benefits of enhancing education access in
Mississippi Disaster-relief fund assists additional Mississippi schools
USA Funds Scholars to receive scholarships Two Mississippi elementary schools receive funds for supplies USA Funds announces plans for Federal Default Fee North Carolina North Carolina State Education Assistance Authority No report submitted. South Carolina South Carolina Tuition Grants Commission The SC Tuition Grants Program was enacted in 1970 by the SC General
Assembly as a “need-based” program for South Carolina
residents attending in-state, independent colleges on a full-time
basis. In the current 2005-2006 school year, approximately $29.6 million
will be awarded to 11,940 students attending the 20 eligible SC independent
colleges. The maximum award for 2005-2006 is $2,600 and the average
award is approximately $2,400. The momentum of Governor Sanford’s budget recommendation carried forward into the House Ways and Means Committee. While reducing the Governor’s recommendation by $2.4 million, the 2006-2007 State Appropriations bill was recently passed by the South Carolina General Assembly and included a $3.7 million increase in Lottery funds to the SC Tuition Grants Program. A proviso exempting the SC Tuition Grants Program from mid-year reductions was also added to permanent provisos. The $3.7 million increase will enable the Grants Commission to increase maximum grants to $3,150 at all colleges. The budget must still go to a House/Senate Conference Committee, but since the SC Tuition Grants increase is in both the House and the Senate budgets, the likelihood that the increase will remain and ultimately be signed by Governor Sanford is good. The state of North Carolina recently began a new state lottery and it is expected that the South Carolina lottery revenue will decrease from the impact of the NC lottery. The SC Tuition Grants Program currently receives $4 million annually from lottery proceeds. The $3.7 million increase approved by the House is all in lottery funds. South Carolina Student Loan Corporation, designated
guarantor for South Carolina Loan Volume Customer Service Financial Aid Outreach Tennessee Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation TSAC Road Show Tennessee Education Lottery Scholarship Program The Tennessee Education Lottery Scholarship program expects to see legislative additions to the program; including raising the HOPE scholarship award amount for the 2006-2007 year and creating a new advanced degree scholarship award for math and science teachers. Tennessee Student Assistance Award Program Loan Division Compliance Division Communication Services Division Virginia State Council of Higher Education for Virginia (SCHEV) No report submitted. Educational Credit Management Corporation (ECMC), designated guarantor for Virginia In March and April ECMC provided Higher Education Reconciliation Act training for over 250 financial aid professionals in seven workshops in Virginia, North Carolina and Oregon. The training covered the entire range of changes from need analysis, Academic Competitiveness Grants to loan program issues. ECMC has committed to paying the Federal default fee for the 2006-2007 academic year rather than deducting this fee from borrowers’ proceeds. This policy applies regardless of the lender the borrower selects. The ECMC Foundation is developing a guide for postsecondary student services and financial aid professionals to use as a resource to retain students from first generation college-going, low income backgrounds. This guide will be in the form of a toolkit containing both reference materials and strategies to encourage and support the success of these students to complete their courses of study and receive higher education degrees. We anticipate this project to be ready sometime in the fall of 2006 and it will be available for download free of charge The Commonwealth College Access Network, an organization to support and nurture college access providers in Virginia, will soon be incorporated as a non-profit corporation. This is an outgrowth of a partnership between ECMC, SCHEV and VASFAA. ECMC has provided $75,000 to CCAN for start-up expenses, and has committed an additional $75,000 in support for 2006-2007. |
||
|
PREVIOUS PAGE ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS ~ NEXT PAGE |